REALLY need a English to French translation...?

"Legally the owner of the vehicle has to pay because this particular offense is known as a vehicular infraction. If the ticket is a result of a problem with the vehicle itself and not the driver, vehicle is ticketed, and since each vehicle has an owner, the bill is directed to the owner. In this case, Claude is the owner, and it was his vehicle that had problems with its headlights. If the ticket was a personal offense and not a problem with the vehicle, it would be known as a personal infraction. IE: if Luc was driving Claude's vehicle and made a red light right turn at an intersection that does not allow red light right turns, then it would obviously be Luc's fault and not the vehicle's fault, therefore Luc would have to pay. However, this is not the case, as the problem is with the car itself and as Claude is the legal owner of the car he must pay for the ticket."









I need this entire paragraph translated from English to (Canadian) french.



Not through an online translator, as those result in incorrect grammar. I need someone who actually knows French fluently to translate this for me. I know I'm asking a lot, but I'd REALLY appreciate if anyone could do this for me.. Thanks!!!REALLY need a English to French translation...?
Selon la loi, le propri茅taire d'un v茅hicule doit payer cette amende, car cette infraction particuli猫re est connue sous le terme d'infraction de v茅hicule. Si l'amende d茅coule d'un probl猫me avec le v茅hicule et non avec le conducteur, la contravention est adress茅e au v茅hicule, et puisque chaque v茅hicule a un propri茅taire, la facture est envoy茅e 脿 ce dernier. Dans ce cas particulier, Claude est le propri茅taire, et c'est son v茅hicule qui avait une d茅fectuosit茅 aux phares. Si l'amende avait 茅t茅 une infraction personnelle et non de v茅hicule, elle aurait 茅t茅 茅mise comme telle. C.-脿-d.: Si Luc conduisait le v茅hicule de Claude et faisait un virage 脿 un feu rouge 脿 une intersection qui ne le permet pas, la faute en reviendrait 茅videmment 脿 Luc et non au v茅hicule, et par cons茅quent Luc aurait 脿 payer. Toutefois, cela n'est pas le cas, et comme le probl猫me est reli茅 au v茅hicule dont Claude est le propri茅taire l茅gal, c'est lui qui doit payer la contravention.